The Universe
- Written by David Hall
- Category: The Universe
We tend to think of opposites as separate qualities. Good is different to evil. Light is different to darkness. High is different to low. Order is different to chaos. Happiness is different to sadness. On is different to off. But there is another way to understand opposites – we can consider opposites as expressions of one quality seemingly stretched apart. A continuum.
Take a heartbeat for example. The heart beats rhythmically as a pulse. We could understand this as a beat of on, off, on, off, on, off etc. But that’s not really what is happening. The rhythm of the heartbeat is continually flowing. The heart is pulsing, extending and contracting in a flowing motion, with peaks and troughs that give the sense of on and off. The heart flows between these opposite states, giving the sense of a beat or pulse So with the heartbeat it’s useful to understand it as a pulse of on and off, but it’s more accurate to understand it as a continuum of opposites.
Let’s also consider day and night. We usually think of these as opposites. Day is when the sun is in the sky. Night is when the sun is below the horizon. We know, of course, that the sun isn’t rising and falling as it appears to be. This is just a reflection of the planet's rotation, that gives the appearance that the sun is moving. That’s pretty basic really, and taken for granted these days. But it is an example of the reflection of movement and stillness in the world, a great display of the mechanics of manifestation. But let’s get back to the point of day and night. We can consider them as opposites, where one is light and the other dark. That’s one way to understand it. But a more accurate way is to understand it as a flowing between the brightening and darkening of light, a continual flow of brightness, becoming more bright, then less bright, more bright, then less bright. We could call it a Continuum of Brightness that gives the appearance of what we can then call day and night.
Perhaps a more difficult and emotive pair of opposites to consider is good and evil. These too can be considered as a continuum. Goodness is a kindness, a closeness to others, an openness, a selflessness, showing actions that are constructive and supportive of the whole. Evil is its opposite, hateful, distancing from others, closed, selfish, with destructive actions that are self-serving and against the whole. We can consider them as distinct opposites, but they have a connection. The opposites are bound together as reflective qualities of one quality. They are not clear cut. We could say there are degrees of goodness and evil, ranging from great goodness, to slight goodness, to okay-ness, to some badness, to destructive evil. We can consider this a Continuum of Goodness, a flowing out from supreme goodness, stretching away, becoming its opposite as extreme evil. Evil actions are actions at odds with Wholeness. They are actions seemingly far removed from the respect of the Wholeness of Life. Yet they are inevitably still within the Wholeness of Life.
You see, the opposites are never really separated or divided. Wholeness is maintained. The opposites do not stand alone, separate from one another. The Continuum of Opposites is the appearance of separation whilst maintaining Wholeness. This brings us back to the point mentioned above, where the reflection of opposites in the world shows the mechanics of manifestation. The apparent separation of opposites is the means by which the universe appears. Contrast is needed for something to appear from nothing. Yet these contrasting qualities can never truly be separated. They can only appear to be separated. The Wholeness of the Singularity is timelessly maintained throughout the appearance of separation that makes perception of the world possible.
I have often used the term ‘The World of Opposites’. That’s a way to understand the appearance of the world. A more accurate way would be as ‘Oneness’.
- Written by David Hall
- Category: The Universe
It's useful to consider this: Does the universe really change? Does the universe ever become something other than what it is? By 'universe' I don't mean one universe out of many different universes, as some may theorise. I mean the Whole.
Certainly the universe appears as though it is continually changing, but there is something that remains unchanged. The universe can't really become something other than what it is. It is neither more nor less than what it always is. There is nothing from which the universe can gain, and nothing to which the universe can lose, because there is nothing else.
It seems that the universe is changelessly changing. Even from the human perspective, the Earth and other planets spin around the Sun, clouds come and go, temperatures rise and fall, plants grow and fade, animals multiply and roam around the planet. Even when we are unaware of any noticeable movement we know that there is always change. The body breathes, food is digested, skin cells die and are replaced, right now. I hesitate to say 'every moment' because there are not really many moments. It's the appearance of continual flowing change in the Now.
The universe appears to be moving continually, but where can it go? Does the universe ever go anywhere other than where it always is? Since the universe contains all, there is nothing beyond it. So the universe cannot really be said to move somewhere else. There isn't somewhere else, although movement appears to happen within the universe. Even 'within' isn't accurate, as the universe has no limits to be within. There is really neither insider nor outside the universe. There is just What Is.
From the human perspective this moving, changing universe is observed from an unmoving, unchanging point. The body may move around in the world, but this movement is observed. No matter where you seem to go, you are always Here. No matter how the universe seems to change it is always perceived Now, and it can never be anything other than what it is.
- Written by David Hall
- Category: The Universe
It seems a strange question: was the universe created? It's generally assumed that the universe was created, whether it's believed that God created the universe or the universe exploded from a Big Bang. How could it not be created? Here we have a universe with stars and planets, and planet Earth with humans, animals, plants, and so on. Something must have made this happen...
The problem with creation is that it implies there is a cause. It implies cause and effect. But cause and effect are only conceptual terms for what seems to happen in the world. It's a useful model, but not wholly accurate. It would be more accurate to say that there is continual consequential change. It's not that one 'thing' causes something to happen, then that other 'thing' causes another 'thing', and on and on. There are not really any discrete or separate 'things'. So the terms 'cause' and 'effect' have an assumption of defined, limited, separate 'things'. The real experience is that there is not one then another then another. It's more that the universe unravels or unfolds continually.
There may appear to be lulls in the flow of change, but these are temporary and ultimately also part of the change. Any appearance of no change is illusory. There is only ever a pretence of stillness in the universe. Just as we may assume that cars parked out in the street are still, whilst really they are spinning through space on a planet that never stops spinning and moving.
We can assume that this appearance of the universe as change and movement came from a point of no change or movement. We can assume that the apparent universe did appear from nothing, yes. But it would be a full, complete Nothing - an unmanifest Singularity, from which everything appeared and in which it appears. An unmanifest Singularity has no time or space. It has no limits. So the creation of the universe is the appearance from this complete unmanifest Nothingness. What caused the appearance of the universe? That's the question.
Cause and effect are already questionable, so can we consider that nothing caused the appearance of the universe? Well, possibly, as what appears appears out of Nothing and in Nothing. Also, there is no appearance without the witnessing of it. Effectively, no seen without the seer. The seen and the seer arise simultaneously - what appears and the witness of this appear simultaneously. The universe and I appear simultaneously. The Singularity seems to divide into the knower knowing the known. It doesn't really divide, because the Singularity is always maintained.
It's difficult to accept that the universe only appears once there is one to witness it. It's generally accepted that the universe appeared long before it created beings that could perceive it. But all we can reasonably say is that the universe that I perceive seems to have existed before I perceived it. But by 'I' we mean the human being. The human being is part of the universe. Is there a possibility that the universe was perceived by that which created it or in which it was created?
So we come full circle to the question of whether the universe was created? Well, what exists is here timelessly, uncreated. Existence itself, or Being, is permanently timeless and formless. This is the universe. The visible or perceivable universe of forms that seems to appear in time and space is like an expression or reflection of Timeless Dimensionless Being. The universe isn't created or destroyed, it only appears to be created and destroyed within the permanence of Being.
That sounds like a complicated answer. The simple answer is that Being is the nature of the universe. It just is.
- Written by David Hall
- Category: The Universe
Planet Earth seems like an extreme expression of separation. Plants, animals and humans fight for survival. It's a planet of competition. Survival of the fittest. Let's understand what's happening here.
The planet appears as a heavy dense world of competing and clashing forms. Heavy tectonic plates separate and crush against one another, building up harsh, dense mountain ranges. Plants grow where they can. They compete with other plants that have separated from them in evolutionary history. They change and develop to survive. Animals develop, protecting themselves from other animals and the environment. Some animals hunt other animals and need to kill and eat them to survive. Even animals of the same species or family fight against each other, to defend their chosen territory or to protect themselves or their offspring.
Humans fight other humans, physically and verbally. They fight their close family members and those who are further separated from them. They build walls and fences. They mark out imaginary borders between territories and fight to keep these in place. Fighting, harming, abusing and killing is the extremity of separation. It is the furthest limit of limitation.
Why is this so important to understand? Because it explains the world as an expression of Oneness far removed. The expression of many separate limited forms is the reflection of the reality of Infinite Oneness. The universe appears as if the Singularity has exploded into a multiplicity. There arises an appearance of distance and separation out of the unmanifest unity of the Singularity. Planet Earth is an expression of this at the far reaches of separation, where forms appear solid, separate and clashing.
The apparent density of form is an expression of limitation, which in turn is a reflection of the Limitless. The scattering and evolutionary development of plant forms and animal forms is an expression of separation. Differences arise, to further express separation. Individual identity seems to arise, solidifying the appearance of separate forms distinct from one another. Fighting to survive becomes the natural way at the far reaches of separation. Some forms team together, but even teams fight against each other. Tribes fight against other tribes. Gangs fight against other gangs. Countries fight against other countries. It is a catastrophic demonstration of limitation and separation.
But we can see through it. Solid forms aren't as solid and impermeable as they seem. The limits we assume are not true limits. The world is only an appearance of limitation and separation. That is not the reality of it. The Reality is that the Infinite Oneness is never divided, never broken. The universe doesn't appear 'from' the splitting of a singularity, it appears 'in' the Singularity. There is no true division or separation. There is only ever One appearing to be many. Planet Earth is an experience of separation, but not a reality of separation. Even the Earth can be considered singularly.
There is only ever an Infinite One, no matter how limited, divided and separate it may appear. The appearance of limitation and separation is illusory. It appears as the reflection and contrasting opposite of Infinite Oneness. Humanity has the ability to recognise this and choose to live in line with Oneness. There are no others, only the appearance of otherness. Differences are the play of the world. Differences are to be celebrated as expressions of the Oneness in which they appear.
So, yes, planet Earth may be an expression of extreme separation, but this is a reflection of the reality of Oneness in which it appears. There is only One appearing to be limited and divided. It is the play of the World of Opposites within the Indivisible Infinite One.